Fireflies transcribe creates recaps of the memorable podcasts, lectures, and video content in the technology, startup, and entrepreneurship space.
- Build a product so good that users tell their friends - 80% of the work
- Simple to explain, easy to understand
- Market with exponential growth - Total addressable market over time
- Follow real trends which are where a small group use it intensely
- Need an evangelical founder- promotes/sells the vision
- Easier to start a hard product than an easier startup
- Why should someone join your startup - impact
- Courage of conviction even in the face of a lot of doubt - need optimists
- VCs like startups that may have low chance of success but can go big
- Team you build is the company you build
- Teammates who take accountability and ownership
- Never lose momentum - very difficult to get back
- Competitive advantage over time - long time moat
- Have sensible business model & customer acquisition strategy
- More the market is changing the more your agility as a small company matters
- Startups win big platform shifts because they adapt faster than big companies
generated by fireflies.ai
Okay today, I'm going to talk about how to succeed with a startup. Obviously more than can be said here in 20 minutes, but I will do the best I can. The most important thing. The number one lesson we try to teach startups is that the degree to which you're successful, approximates the degree to which you build a product that is so good people spontaneously tell their friends about it. Startups always ask us for the secret to success. They always want to believe it's something other than this, because this is really hard to do. This is if you can build a product that is so good, people spontaneously tell their friends about it. You have done 80% of the work that you need to be a really successful startup. If you think about the most successful companies, Google, Facebook, whatever, you probably found out about them because a friend of yours said, you got to try this.
It's great. So this is the bar. Something that people love so much. They tell their friends about it. One important indicator for a product like that is a product that's simple to explain and easy to understand. If you can't explain in a few words what you do. If people don't, if at least some people don't say, Oh, that's pretty interesting. That's usually a mistake. It's usually a sign of unclear thinking or a need that is not big enough. Another thing that startups need to look for is a market that is either started to undergo, or is soon going to undergrowth exponential growth. I think this is actually related to one of the biggest mistakes investors make when evaluating startups, investors always say, well, what's your growth rate. We care about the growth rate. Investors will forgive smallest revenue today. If it's growing quickly. For some reason, people don't think about markets this way, but if you think about the most important startups, they are the ones that I start in.
Small markets that are growing very quickly. 11 years ago, the market for iPhone apps is $0. It's not huge. I think if you only think about the Tam today, you'll make a big mistake. What you really want to do is identify a market. That's going to grow every year and be able to ride that up elevator. A really important thing to figure, figuring this out is learning how to differentiate between real trends and fake trends. A real trend is something that's actually going to happen and the fake trend is not, or at least not yet. Before you make a big bet on a new platform, you want to make sure it's real. Now there's an easy trick for this, which I'll share. Now, real trends are ones where a new technology platform comes along and the early adopters use it obsessive early until the friends, how much they love it.
A fake trend is one where people may buy the product. Don't use it or at least not enough. An example of a real trend, I already mentioned the iPhone. I mentioned that again, when the iPhone first came out, many people were dismissive because they only sold a million or 2 million that year. They said, well, this just doesn't matter. For the people that had an iPhone, they used it for hours every day, it became central to their lives. They loved it. They told their friends, you got to get one. I think it was obvious then to people paying attention that something had fundamentally shifted. We had a new computing platform that was going to spawn huge businesses. It was a good time to bet on mobile apps, a fake trend, or at least a fake trend as of, August, 2018, I would say is VR.
I do believe VR will be big someday, but today, most people that I know, that own a VR headset use it never or very rarely. So, although a lot of people talk about it and maybe even a lot of people buy them. There's not the intense usage per user among the early adopters that I think you want to see before you make a big bet. Another thing that's startups need at least one evangelical founder, usually CEO, someone at the startup has gotta be the person that is going to recruit, sell the product, talk to the press, raise money. This requires someone who can infect with enthusiasm, the whole world about what the company is trying to do. Someone who becomes the chief evangelist for the, it's very hard to succeed wildly without that. It's very hard to build a team at all without being able to do that.
One thing that helps for this is having an ambitious vision. You never want to be grandiose that turns people off, but you want to let yourself grow more ambitious over time. As long as you do that, organically people will respond. Ambitious visions are exciting. They're fun to work on. In fact, I think in 2018, at least in Silicon Valley, it's easier to start a hard startup than it is to start easy startup. Now, this sounds paradoxical. But ambitious projects are interesting. In the environment, it may be relatively easy to raise capital, but it's really hard to do everything else. There's so many startups. It's so easy to start one. They all sound so promising that, bringing together enough talent in one organization is really hard to do. If you're working on a problem that, may be modestly successful, it's kind of easy to get the first few people to join.
You can give them a lot of equity, but then it gets really hard. Why is employee 20 going to join? Why is this, why does this matter to the world? Why should someone work on your startup versus any of the other things they could do and picking something that matters if you're successful one way to do that. I think it's really important to think about when you're starting a company, how is this going to evolve into a vision that a lot of people want to help with that a lot of people want to be associated with because I think getting talent and getting mind share, it's really hard in the current environment. People are interested in startups than men better. The other thing that we've noticed among our best Saunders, again and again, is that they are, have a confident and definite view of the future.
They may be wrong. We say, it's good to be confident and flexible, but this idea that you are confident, indefinite, this is what I think is going to happen, or this is what is going to happen and being relatively sure of that, having courage of your convictions, being a clear leader, saying, we're going to do this. That's why even in the face of a lot of doubt, that seems to really correlate with success.
This comes back to, having an ambitious vision, but the entire startup ecosystem is best set up to support companies that have a low chance of success, but are huge if they work. I think going for something that is huge, if it works, we'll attract the best people. I'm not going to talk too much about the team. There are a lot of obvious things I could say that have been said many times by many people about, you need smart people who want to work really hard and who communicate well, these are all really true, but I'd like to mention a few non-obvious things that we've noticed that we don't hear people say as much about the team you need to assemble. The node. Costless says that the team you build is the company you build. And, I really think that's true. I've still met only a handful of founders.
I think that spend enough time on recruiting like Mark Zuckerberg is famously one of them, but building a great team, I think other than picking the right market, and building a great product is the most important thing you do. All founders go through a transition, all successful founders, where you switch from building a product to building a company and building a company really is about the team. So you need optimists. The whole world will be telling you why you're going to fail as a startup. If you don't have that internal fire of belief, if you don't have people who say, what, we are going to do this, and it doesn't matter what the haters say, we're going to figure this out. And there is this problem. It must be solvable. If you don't have the spirit of optimism on the team, it's very hard to succeed.
When the world continues to punch you in the face, You need at least some idea generators. There are a handful of people in any company that has gone on to be really successful. That I, that I've been able to work with, who are just really good at coming up with lots of ideas. You don't want too many of these people because that's more ideas than a company can follow through on, but having some people within a company that are just constantly throwing out new ideas, most of which will be bad. It turns out to be super important to have. Spirit of we'll figure it out is my favorite thing to hear, among early startup team members, a lot of things go wrong. The situations that startups winning tend to be incredibly dynamic. This idea that even if I'm not qualified on paper, even if I haven't solved this problem before, even if this problem feels like it's going to kill the company, which many problems will feel that way.
The spirit among the team of, what we've got the people we need, we're going to figure this out. We're going to get this done. That's super important. Another thing that I love to hear from early team members is I've got it. So, you hear in big companies, a lot of people say, that's not my department. It's someone else's going to do that. Or, Ooh, this is really bad. This is going to hurt us. You want people who just step up and say, I'll do it. I've got it. Don't worry about it. You want people to have a bias towards action, startups, especially in their early days. Often when by moving very quickly, you never get as much data as you'd like. You never have as much time to deliberate as you'd like. You want people who are willing to act with much less data than they like to have with much less certainty.
If they act, and it doesn't work, they adapt really quickly and try something else. We talk also about the blessing of inexperience. We have seen many of our startups do incredible things because no one told them it was hard or no one told them they can't do it. There's a great quote from Steve Wazniak about how all the best things he ever did came from having no experience whatsoever and having no money. That obviously it's not always true, but there is a magic thing that happens with startups, especially in the early days before they've learned, they're not supposed to be able to do certain things. I think as a startup, again, it doesn't work to have everybody being experienced, but you can take more bets than you normally would on inexperienced, but super high potential people. That's the end of the topic on team. One of the most important jobs you have as a founder is to never lose momentum.
This is depressing because it means for the first few years, you never get to take your foot off the gas. You never get to really rest. We try to be honest about this, that startups are not the best choice for work-life balance at all, but especially in the early days, startups survive on their own momentum. If you have momentum, people keep delivering results beyond what they think they're capable of. If you lose momentum, it's very difficult to get it back. Continuing to make sure that the startup has a cadence, that the startup keeps winning on a relatively predictable, relatively short and predictable intervals. This is really important. It's up to the founders to make sure that you don't lose a hold of this. Another thing, that we think startups need is a competitive advantage over time. Now this is something that sounds so obvious. I hesitated to even put it in a, this is well discussed, but we're seeing more and more startups, apply to YC.
When we ask them, so what is the long-term monopoly effect here? What is the long-term competitive advantage? What is, where is the network effect in this business? They look at us like it's the first time we've ever, they've ever heard this question. All of the really great businesses, I know, have answer to this question. In fact, the better they are, the more they pretend not to. This is something that you want to have a plan for. Another thing you want to have a plan for is at least a sensible business model. You don't have to have it all figured out at the beginning. When we ask founders, so how are you ever going to make money? And they look at us like it's the first time they've ever been asked that question, which happens more often than you would think recently, that's a bad sign too.
Again, this one is so common that I hesitate to put it in here. When we ask a startup, how they're going to grow, how they're going to get users, and they look at us like it's the first time they've ever heard that question, bad sign. So some sensible idea to try here. First. Paul blue height once, spent a bunch of time looking. One of the YC partners, spent a bunch of time looking at the traits of our best founders and tried to distill down. He came up with frugality focus, obsession, and love. I actually, I think that is really good. I don't have much to add. I think these are things that you should be able to say about what you're doing and you as a founder. Finally, I want to talk about why startups get to beat big companies. We've there are lots of reasons I'm going to talk about a few common ones here.
I think these trends are valuable enough that as you evaluate startup ideas, you might do, it's worth thinking about if you fit into these, because it's really hard for startups to beat big companies most of the time. Here's some areas where we see it happening repeatedly.
I think one difference is if you are a product manager at a big company and you want to do something, that sounds like a bad idea, but is a good idea. You have to get everybody from your boss sometimes all the way up to the CEO to say yes. So one note can kill you. If you're a startup, you can go to YC demo day. Any number of the thousands of investors can say yes, and you get to have a crack at it. So it's a very different mindset. For those ideas that sound bad, but are good. Because of this phenomenon, this one, no versus one, yes, startups can win. In fact, startups usually do beat big companies in that category of ideas. Look for ideas that sound bad, but are good and where you are much more likely to get one. Yes. Someone at a big company is to get all yeses.
Another area where startups usually be big companies. Aren't very fast changing markets startups. Great speed. Great advantage is an agility and speed. The Maura market is changing the higher, the number of decisions you get to make, and the higher number of tweaks to your product, and your strategy you got to make. You want to optimize the number of those decisions that someone has to make to compete with you because a big company will make them on average, worse than certainly much slower than you do. The speed of market evolution, gives you a lot more chances to compound your advantage over a big company. Finally startups usually win on big platform shifts. Many people have observed that startups coming to these clusters. Those clusters usually come after a big platform shift. We'll stick with the iPhone example here. After mobile apps became a thing, many new companies got started that are now quite valuable.
One of the reasons here is, most large companies work on annual cadence at least. When there's a huge platform shift, they are not good at making a big enough strategic pivot. The battleship just turns to slowly, whereas a startup can say, wow, woke up this morning. The world is fundamentally different than it was six months ago. We're going to go all in on this new direction. That's the way that startups usually win or that's an area where startups usually win. There, there are many others. Thinking about these three, I think is directionally a good thing to do. Alright. That's all I've got for today. Jeff, thank you very much for having me and for the class.