The Best Gong Alternative in 2026: Fireflies vs Gong Compared

Gong earned its name in revenue intelligence by turning recorded sales calls into deal risk signals and reliable forecasts. The catch is the price. Independent breakdowns put Gong's licenses around $1,300 to $1,425 a seat per year, commonly quoted nearer $1,600, plus a platform fee that runs from $5,000 to $50,000.

While that investment may be justified for large enterprises, it could be a challenge for smaller teams, budget-conscious users, and those prioritizing cost over complex features. Those reasons are why they end up seeking a more accessible Gong alternative. This guide gives a straight answer. It covers why Gong costs what it costs, what it does genuinely well, where Fireflies, an AI assistant built for the whole company, takes a different approach, how the two compare feature by feature, and which teams should choose each.

What is Gong?

Gong began as a tool that recorded and analyzed sales calls, and that reputation has outlived the reality. The company now describes its platform as a Revenue AI Operating System, its own term for a single system that captures customer conversations across calls, email, and meetings and turns them into action for revenue teams. Gong calls the data layer underneath it the Revenue Graph.

In practice, the platform aims squarely at sales performance. Gong records and transcribes meetings across the major conferencing tools, then analyzes what it captures. It measures how much reps talk versus listen, flags objection patterns and competitor mentions, and surfaces the moments in a deal that tend to predict whether it closes.

Around that core sit its revenue tools, including deal risk scoring, pipeline forecasting through the Forecast module, and AI sales engagement through the Engage module. Gong has also built a roster of named AI agents for specific jobs, from extracting data to briefing reps before calls, plus Agent Studio for teams that want to configure their own. In late 2025 it introduced Gong Orchestrate, a layer meant to connect revenue strategy to front-line execution by defining sales plays, guiding reps through them in real time, and measuring which ones move the business.

Gong currently supports more than 70 languages and connects to 250+ tools, though its integrations cluster around the revenue stack.

On February 25, 2026, Gong launched Mission Andromeda, its largest release of the year. The launch pushed the platform deeper into account management via the Account Console and formalized coaching through Gong Enable. It also introduced Gong Assistant, a conversational chatbot, and established MCP interoperability. This functionality connects Gong's ecosystem directly to outside systems like Salesforce Agentforce, Microsoft Copilot, and HubSpot.

As of May 2026, Gong reports more than 5,000 customer organizations, including LinkedIn, Shopify, Slack, and Zillow, and has crossed $500 million in ARR in 10 straight quarters of accelerating growth. G2 has ranked it the No. 1 Best Software Product across multiple years, and the 2025 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Revenue Action Orchestration named it a Leader.

Why Teams Look for a Gong Alternative

Even though the platform dominates the enterprise market, many teams find that its rigid structure and heavy overhead create significant operational friction. Users typically look for alternative options because of four specific, documented challenges.

The cost, and why it scales badly for most teams

Cost is the main reason teams go looking for a Gong alternative. Gong doesn't publish prices. Its pricing page is gated behind a demo request, so the only way to get a real quote is to book a call with sales and wait for a custom proposal.

However, there are some third-party breakdowns circulating to give rough estimations of Gong’s price. As of a 2026 MarketBetter pricing breakdown, Gong charges roughly $1,360 or more per user per year for teams of 3 to 49, alongside mandatory minimum seat requirements and a separate platform fee. Key features like Forecast, Engage, and Gong Enable are billed as separate add-on modules.

That stacks the bill three ways at once and could be a dealbreaker for a smaller team. Here is how that compares to a platform built to cover the whole company, such as Fireflies, at three common team sizes.

Sales-centric design that doesn't work org-wide

Gong is built for revenue work, serving sales, customer success, RevOps, and revenue leadership. Core tools like deal forecasting, pipeline risk, and call coaching are tuned exactly for those roles. However, this specialization also means that teams outside of revenue, such as HR, product, and operations, receive minimal value from the platform. As a result, companies that buy Gong usually end up paying for two systems anyway.

Organizations that want to be more efficient typically look for Gong alternatives that cover the whole company instead. Fireflies fits this requirement perfectly. It works across every department from the first meeting it joins, meaning one tool serves the sales floor, the product team, the recruiting pipeline, and the executive staff meeting alike.

Implementation and time to value

Deploying Gong typically takes weeks of hands-on implementation, dedicated user training, and ongoing management from a customer success manager. That's workable if you have the time and the people to run a proper rollout. For a team that doesn't, and just wants a tool that works the day they sign up, it's a real obstacle, and that's where options come in. Fireflies connects through calendar sync and starts capturing meetings within minutes, with AI notes and a summary waiting the moment a call ends.

No free plan

Gong has no free tier, so there's no way to try it before you commit. Every evaluation starts with a sales call and a wait for a custom quote, which means a team that just wants to see the product has to book a meeting, sit through a pitch, and chase a proposal before it can judge anything. For a user comparing several tools at once, those extra steps are friction, and they're often where smaller teams quietly drop Gong from the list.

Most Gong alternatives don't put that wall up. Fireflies offers a free plan, a public pricing page, and no minimum seat count. Any team can test it on real meetings before talking to anyone.

How Fireflies Compares to Gong

The key difference between Fireflies and Gong is what each is built to do. So comparing them as a checklist of matching features could miss the point. Gong is a deep revenue platform made for enterprise sales teams, priced and engineered around forecasting, pipeline risk, and rep coaching. Fireflies is an AI assistant that works across the whole company, from meetings and email to Slack and CRM, at a price most teams can actually approve.

The comparison below will weigh the dimensions a team actually decides on when it puts Fireflies vs Gong side by side.

Pricing: The Core Difference

Verdict: Fireflies.

We established the initial sticker shock of Gong earlier in this guide. The base license is only the starting line, as a standard contract stacks per-seat licenses on top of a mandatory platform fee, enforces minimum seat counts, and locks additional features, such as Forecast, Engage, and Gong Enable, behind separate add-on costs. Because of how Gong pricing is structured, even large enterprises with comfortable software budgets rarely pay a single, predictable number.

When looking at Fireflies pricing, it takes a different approach. Individuals testing the product or running occasional meetings can start on the free plan, which includes unlimited transcription up to 400 minutes per team. Teams that want the basics at a lower cost can move to the Pro tier at $10 a seat, which covers recording and core meeting workflows. The Business plan runs $19 a seat per month billed annually, which is the tier most growing teams choose, and it includes unlimited transcription, summaries, and storage alongside advanced collaboration and analytics. Organizations with stricter compliance needs, SSO requirements, private storage, and HIPAA compliance step up to the Enterprise tier at $39 a seat. Across all these tiers, there is no platform fee, no minimum seat count, and no separate invoice for core features.

When you map those models to a 100-person team, the math heavily favors Fireflies. A 100-seat Fireflies Business deployment costs roughly $22,800 a year. A comparable Gong contract, based on a 2026 MarketBetter pricing breakdown, starts at roughly $141,000 before separately priced modules and implementation. That is a difference of more than $100,000 a year for the core work of capturing, transcribing, and acting on meeting data.

Here is what each platform costs at three common team sizes, and what that price actually includes.

Transcription and Meeting Intelligence

Verdict: Fireflies, on language coverage and accuracy.

Both Fireflies and Gong handle the core job of meeting transcription, recording conversations, identifying speakers, and timestamping every line across major conferencing platforms. 

However, when it comes to accuracy, Fireflies wins. Its transcription accuracy hits 99% for English and 95% for other languages, maintaining quality even on accented speech. Gong, on the other hand, doesn't publish an official transcription accuracy percentage in its current documentation. It claims to capture 99% of customer interactions, but that metric reflects meeting coverage instead of transcription quality.

The advantage widens for global teams running deals across several regions. Fireflies transcribes 100+ languages with automatic language detection and can switch languages partway through a call, while Gong lists support for 70+.

Finally, if how you extract and share these meeting records is a practical consideration, Fireflies wins here too. It natively exports transcripts, summaries, and recordings in the formats teams actually use, such as DOCX, PDF, SRT, CSV, and JSON. By comparison, Gong's native downloads give you a TXT transcript, an MP4 video, or a WAV audio file per call. Extracting anything structured or in bulk requires routing through its API, which means developer time.

Post-meeting AI Automation and Workflows

Verdict: Fireflies on breadth, Gong on sales-specific depth.

A transcript is raw material. What each tool builds from it is where they split. Fireflies turns a finished call into a structured summary with keywords, a meeting outline, action items tagged to their owners, and sentiment, plus sections you can shape yourself through AI Skills. Those summaries sync automatically to your CRM, Slack, and project tools, and they can trigger follow-up work on their own.

Gong’s automation and workflows prioritize specialized depth for sales teams. While its Spotlight summary delivers a standard recap of key points and next steps, the platform's true value lies in how it deeply analyzes a conversation to surface objection patterns, competitor mentions, talk-to-listen benchmarks, and deal-level coaching flags. Additionally, the Gong Assistant feature allows managers to use natural language to query a specific call, instantly extracting pain points or objections without ever replaying the recording.

The choice depends on where this data needs to go. For a sales manager reviewing a pipeline, Gong's deep, deal-level intelligence is undeniably sharper. However, if the meeting summary needs to travel across departments outside the sales organization, Fireflies provides a much more adaptable and portable record.

Sales Intelligence and Revenue Analytics

Verdict: Gong, for enterprise sales teams.

This is the one dimension where Gong leads. Its Revenue Graph captures far more interaction data than a standard CRM by aggregating calls, emails, meetings, and external signals, then automatically mapping them to the correct accounts and deals. On top of that sit the specialized tools enterprise revenue teams pay for. Deal risk scoring flags slipping opportunities early, the Forecast module models pipeline health, and the Engage module executes sales engagement sequences.

Fireflies handles only the foundational elements here. It has Deal Intelligence feature to flag risks and draft next steps post-call, while its CRM Skills automatically populate data fields to eliminate manual data entry. However, Fireflies lacks any equivalent to Gong's predictive pipeline modeling or broad Revenue Graph analytics.

Organizations that rely heavily on forecast calls, quota rollups, and conversation-driven pipeline metrics must weigh this limitation honestly, because even the strongest Gong alternative won't close that specific gap.

Coaching and Sales Enablement

Verdict: Gong for enterprise coaching programs, Fireflies for teams that want coaching without the overhead.

Gong Enable, the enablement product that launched with Mission Andromeda in February 2026, is built for structured programs. AI Call Reviewer grades reps against your own scorecards by analyzing real calls, then routes them into lessons matched to each role. AI Trainer lets reps rehearse the hard moments, like a pricing objection or a renewal at risk, against AI simulations drawn from conversations that actually closed. Initiative Tracking ties all of it back to win rates, deal size, and ramp time, so an enablement lead can prove a program changed behavior rather than just logged completions. This is the structured enablement that platforms like Highspot and Seismic built their businesses on, now sitting inside the same tool that records the calls.

Fireflies approaches coaching from the other direction. Live Assist surfaces answers during a call, pulling from past meetings, pricing conversations, and the way your strongest reps have handled the same objection before, so a newer rep gets help while the call is still live. After the call, Fireflies tracks the coaching basics across every meeting, how much a rep talks versus listens, filler words, sentiment, and speaking pace, so a manager can spot patterns without scrubbing recordings by hand.

The split comes down to how you coach. A small or midsize team that wants contextual help during calls and simple analytics afterward gets what it needs from Fireflies. An enterprise organization running a formal coaching methodology with dedicated enablement headcount is the team that will actually use Gong Enable.

Integrations and Agentic Automation

Verdict: Fireflies.

On paper, Gong appears to offer the larger ecosystem. According to its official documentation, Gong supports over 250 integrations, with a Salesforce connection deep enough for an enterprise sales organization to build its entire workflow around. The platform recently expanded its reach with Model Context Protocol interoperability, allowing it to exchange signals with systems like Microsoft 365 Copilot and Salesforce Agentforce. However, Gong specifically designs its catalog for the revenue stack, prioritizing the CRMs, dialers, and specific sales tools a revenue team already runs.

Fireflies connects to over 100 tools, but the defining difference is where that connectivity reaches. The supported list spans CRMs, dialers, project management platforms, cloud storage, and collaboration hubs, including HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, Jira, Asana, Notion, Slack, and Zoom. That range means Fireflies plugs into the recruiting pipeline, the product backlog, and executive workspaces, serving every department instead of one function deeply.

If you’re looking for a tool that automates work after a call, both of them do it. Gong's agents fill CRM fields and draft follow-ups for the revenue team, and Fireflies AI Skills do the same through 200+ automations that run with no manual trigger, populating CRM fields, drafting follow-up emails, and pushing summaries into Slack the moment a call ends.

Where Fireflies goes a step further is its autonomous Voice Agents. These agents can conduct calls completely unattended. Teams can use Fireflies’ Voice agent to handle candidate interview screens, initial discovery calls, and routine check-ins, delivering the same structured transcripts and summaries as any other meeting.

For a sales team who heavily uses Salesforce, Gong provides undeniable depth. But for organizations that prioritize integration across every internal department, and one that can even run the call when no one is free to, Fireflies holds the clear advantage.

Security, Compliance, and Privacy

Verdict: Both meet enterprise standards.

Gong and Fireflies are equally strong when it comes to meeting enterprise compliance standards. As of June 2026, Gong maintains a strong security posture. Its trust center documents SOC 2 Type II, the EU-US Data Privacy Framework, and an extensive ISO family covering 27001, 27017, 27018, 27701, and the recently added 42001 for artificial intelligence management. It also holds a PCI DSS SAQ-D and maps its SOC 2 report directly to HIPAA security requirements. That depth suits the user it's built for, namely large, regulated organizations whose procurement and legal teams demand a fully audited certification trail before they sign.

Fireflies holds to the same enterprise standards. It applies SOC 2 Type II and GDPR compliance on every plan, including the Free tier. This structure means a small team operating on the Free tier receives the exact same fundamental security infrastructure as a paying enterprise customer without incurring any additional costs. For highly regulated organizations requiring HIPAA compliance or private storage to control data residency, Fireflies provides full coverage through its Enterprise tier alongside a signed business associate agreement.

Fireflies is equally direct regarding how it handles user information. Its stated policy reads, “Fireflies.ai does not use customer data to train any AI models. Your personal data is never used to train AI models. Users own their data.” On retention, the policy adds, “We impose a zero-data retention policy for meeting content with our AI vendors.”

Ease of Use and Time to Value

Verdict: Fireflies.

Gong requires a structured corporate rollout. As an enterprise revenue platform, the onboarding process is coordinated directly with Gong's implementation team to connect an organization's CRM and broader sales stack. This deployment includes dedicated training tracks for both sales representatives and managers before the tool can be fully used.

Fireflies’ deployment is much simpler, a user-driven activation. The initial setup requires connecting a user's calendar, and once synced, the AI Notetaker joins your scheduled meetings on its own across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. When a call ends, the transcript and an AI summary with action items are waiting, delivered to your inbox and pushed into your selected workflows like Slack. There's almost nothing to learn, because Fireflies runs in the background of the meetings and tools your team already uses, with no console to configure and no internal rollout to manage.

For a team that needs an AI assistant working on this week's calls, Fireflies is the obvious choice, and the Free plan means you can test its features on real meetings before committing to anything.

Fireflies vs Gong: Full Comparison Table

Who Should Choose Fireflies?

Fireflies is the better choice for most teams that aren't a large enterprise sales organization. The case is clearest in these situations. When several of these are true at once, and for teams outside enterprise sales they usually are, Fireflies is simply the better fit.

• Teams under 200 people get the same meeting capture and analysis Gong offers, without the seat licensing and platform fee Gong layers on top.
• If you want meeting tools across sales, customer success, HR, product, and operations rather than the sales org alone, Fireflies works across the whole company while Gong is built for revenue teams.
• Choose Fireflies if you need to be capturing meetings today rather than after weeks of setup. Fireflies connects through calendar sync in minutes with no implementation project.
• Global teams gain more transcription languages support with Fireflies. It supports 100+ languages against Gong's 70. Fireflies also comes with automatic detection when a call changes language.
• When the goal is less manual work, Fireflies AI Skills run 200+ automations after a meeting, filling CRM fields, drafting follow-ups, and updating Slack and project tools on their own.
• If you want to test on real meetings before signing anything, Fireflies has a free plan with unlimited transcription and Gong has no free tier at all.
• Fireflies, with its Voice Agents feature, suit teams that want screening and routine calls handled autonomously, running interview screens, discovery, and check-ins and returning a transcript and summary like any meeting.
• Smaller teams that still need enterprise security keep SOC 2 Type II and GDPR on every Fireflies plan, including the free one, with no AI training on their data.
• Startups, small businesses, and midsize companies get the meeting capture, coaching, and automation the big platforms sell, at a fraction of the price.

Who Should Choose Gong?

Gong is the right call for a specific profile, the large enterprise sales organization with the budget, the people, and the revenue at stake to use its depth fully. It's the better choice in cases like these. For a team that fits this profile, Gong's price buys capability it will genuinely use. For everyone else, that depth is mostly cost.

• A sales floor of 100 reps changes the math entirely, since even a small lift in win rate across that many deals can cover Gong's licensing and platform fee several times over.
• Forecasting from real conversation data instead of gut feel or CRM entries is Gong's home turf, and nothing in Fireflies matches its Forecast module.
• Teams standardizing on a single Revenue AI OS get sales engagement, pipeline forecasting, and structured coaching (Gong Engage, Gong Forecast, and Gong Enable) under one roof rather than stitched together from separate tools.
• When Salesforce sits at the center of your stack, Gong's integration there is as deep as it gets, and RevOps teams build their workflow around it.
• Grading every rep against your own sales methodology at scale is exactly what Gong's AI Call Reviewer does, scoring real calls so coaching stays consistent across a large team.
• A dedicated RevOps or enablement function will put Gong's analytics to work managing rep performance, the kind of ongoing use a leaner team would never fully tap.

A Note on Gong's 2026 Mission Andromeda Launch

Announced February 25, 2026, Mission Andromeda was Gong's largest release of the year and the first in a new cadence of named, themed platform launches. It pushed the Revenue AI OS past its sales roots into enablement, account management, and connections to outside AI systems.

The centerpiece is Gong Enable, a revenue enablement product that is generally available. It has three parts. AI Call Reviewer grades reps against your own scorecards by analyzing real calls. AI Trainer lets reps rehearse moments like pricing objections against simulations drawn from conversations that closed. Initiative Tracking ties those programs back to win rates, deal size, and ramp time. Gong Enable is sold as a separate add-on rather than bundled into the base platform.

Three more pieces landed alongside it. Account Console and Account Boards pull a customer's activity, risk signals, and AI summaries into one view, so post-sales teams can manage renewals and expansion with the same context sales has. Gong Assistant, the conversational layer for asking about deals and pipeline in plain language, is now generally available, and Gong reported its usage grew more than 200% year over year by May 2026. Gong also added support for Model Context Protocol, which lets its agents exchange signals with outside systems like Microsoft 365 Copilot and Salesforce Agentforce, with HubSpot among the broader set of partners Gong has named.

For a reader weighing the two tools, Mission Andromeda mostly confirms the pattern. Gong keeps adding depth aimed at large revenue organizations, structured coaching, account analytics, and agent interoperability, which is genuinely useful if you are that user. It doesn't change the underlying tradeoff. The capability is real, the platform is still priced and built for the enterprise, and for a smaller team looking at a Gong alternative, none of these additions move the cost or the complexity in their favor.

Migrating from Gong to Fireflies

If you've decided to switch, the move is straightforward, with one thing to plan around. Fireflies offers a migration service for teams coming from any platform, and its onboarding team handles the setup so you start capturing meetings right away.

The one caveat is your old data. Your Gong transcripts, analytics, and deal history live inside Gong and stay there, so nothing from past calls carries over. Treat the switch as a clean break. Fireflies starts fresh from your next meeting forward, while Gong keeps the historical record for as long as you need to reference it. For most teams, that's a minor tradeoff against a far lower bill, and the new system is capturing and organizing meetings the same afternoon you connect your calendar.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best alternative to Gong?

Fireflies is the best alternative to Gong for most teams. It delivers the core of what Gong does, meeting capture, transcription, summaries, and CRM automation, while reaching across the whole company at a fraction of the cost. It wins for most teams on:

• Price, from $10 a seat per month against Gong's custom enterprise quotes
• A free plan with no minimum seat count
• Use across every department, not just sales
• 100+ languages against Gong's 70+

Gong remains the stronger pick for large enterprise sales organizations that need its forecasting depth.

Why do people leave Gong?

People leave Gong, or rule it out before buying, mainly over cost. Its licensing plus a mandatory platform fee runs into the tens of thousands a year even for midsize teams, and its tools are built for the revenue org rather than the whole company. Add a setup measured in weeks and the lack of a free plan or public pricing, and smaller teams often look elsewhere.

How much does Gong cost per user in 2026?

Gong doesn't publish pricing publicly, so every quote comes from a sales call. Independent breakdowns in 2026 put its licenses around $1,300 to $1,425 a seat per year, commonly quoted nearer $1,600, plus a mandatory platform fee of $5,000 to $50,000 and modules priced separately. A team of 50 generally lands somewhere from $70,000 to well over $120,000 a year before implementation.

Is Fireflies as good as Gong?

Yes, for most teams, and better on several fronts. Fireflies matches Gong on transcription, AI summaries, coaching, and CRM automation, beats it on language coverage and use across departments, and adds AI Skills and Voice Agents that Gong doesn't match. Gong is stronger in one area, enterprise revenue forecasting built from conversation data, which matters most to large sales organizations.

What is Gong used for?

Gong is used to record and analyze sales calls, emails, and meetings, then turn them into deal risk signals, forecasts, and rep coaching. Sales leaders use it to see what is really happening in deals, forecast from buyer behavior rather than gut feel, and coach reps from real conversations. It is built for revenue teams, including sales, customer success, RevOps, and revenue leadership.

Does Fireflies have revenue intelligence?

Fireflies has the practical layer of revenue intelligence most teams use. Its Deal Intelligence flags deal risks and drafts next steps, and its CRM Skills fill CRM fields automatically. What it doesn't have is Gong's enterprise forecasting depth or its Revenue Graph analytics, so teams that forecast off conversation data at scale will feel the gap.

What is the cheapest Gong alternative?

Among capable Gong alternatives, Fireflies is one of the cheapest. For teams that want full meeting capture and automation without enterprise pricing, the platform is hard to beat. Here is the breakdown of what Fireflies offers at every tier.

• Free plan with unlimited transcription
• Pro at $10 a seat per month
• Business at $19 a seat per month
• No platform fee and no minimum seat count

Who are Gong’s biggest competitors?

Gong competes with a mix of revenue intelligence platforms and broader AI meeting tools. The most common alternatives are:

• Fireflies, an AI assistant for the whole company
• Chorus by ZoomInfo, a revenue intelligence platform
• Avoma, a meeting assistant with conversation analytics
• Clari, a revenue and forecasting platform
• tl;dv, a lightweight meeting recorder

Of these, Fireflies is the closest fit for teams that want Gong's core meeting value without enterprise pricing.

Can Fireflies replace Gong for small teams?

Yes. For small and midsize teams, Fireflies covers the core jobs, recording, transcription, summaries, coaching, and CRM automation, without Gong's cost or implementation. The only thing a small team gives up is enterprise revenue forecasting, which most teams that size don't run anyway.

How does Fireflies compare to Gong for sales teams?

For most sales teams, Fireflies handles the daily work, capturing calls, surfacing coaching cues, flagging deal risks, and filling the CRM, at a fraction of Gong's price. Gong pulls ahead for large sales organizations with dedicated RevOps or enablement staff and a need for deep pipeline forecasting. The dividing line is scale and forecasting depth, not basic capability.

What is Gong's Mission Andromeda?

Mission Andromeda is Gong's February 25, 2026 product launch, its largest of the year. It introduced Gong Enable for structured coaching and Account Console for unified account views, and brought Gong Assistant for conversational deal queries and Model Context Protocol support that connects Gong to systems like Microsoft 365 Copilot and Salesforce Agentforce. It extended Gong's Revenue AI OS into enablement, account management, and AI interoperability.

What happened to Gong in 2026?

In 2026 Gong launched Mission Andromeda, its largest release of the year, on February 25, adding Gong Enable for coaching, Account Console for account management, and Model Context Protocol support. By May 2026 the company reported it had crossed $500 million in ARR on its tenth straight quarter of accelerating growth, and it was named a Leader in the 2025 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Revenue Action Orchestration. Gong Assistant, its conversational AI, became generally available with usage up more than 200% year over year.

Conclusion

Gong is the right tool for a large enterprise sales organization, where deep forecasting and revenue intelligence earn back a price that runs into six figures a year. For nearly everyone else, the SMBs and midsize companies, the teams that need meeting tools beyond sales, the sales floors watching the budget, and anyone who wants to start capturing calls today instead of after weeks of setup, Fireflies is the better answer. You get the same core work, transcription, AI summaries, CRM sync, and coaching, plus a wider reach across email, Slack, Voice Agents, and AI Skills, at $10 to $19 a seat per month.